Legal Opinion

MacChio v. Breunig

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiff brought this action under § 4739 of the General Statutes to recover money he lost and paid to the defendants by betting on certain horse races. The defendants’ appeal from the judgment for the plaintiff is predicated upon the court’s claimed errors in denying their motion for a more par ticular statement, charging the jury, and ruling upon the admission of evidence.

The complaint alleged that between February 3, 1937, and May 3, 1937, the plaintiff by making wagers and betting on certain horses and horse races with the defendants, lost $750 and paid this sum to the defendants who…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kornblau v. McDermantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Zellers v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hotchkiss v. DevitaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Cooke v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  5. Sofas v. McKeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yavis v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Foley v. WhelanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. State v. MarionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. King International Corporation v. VoloshinConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
  5. State v. SeaseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API