Parker v. Compton

I must respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority.

As I understand the majority opinion Mrs. Parker is not entitled to a commission, although the owners agreed that if they sold the property they would pay Mrs. Parker a commission, because (a) Mrs. Parker did not procure a buyer ready, willing, and able to purchase the property under the terms of the listing, (b) the owners contract with Rogers was not binding and enforceable until after the expiration of the listing as it was a "conditional” contract and not a sale under the reasoning of Gudim Realty, Inc. v. Hughes (1969), 284…