Legal Opinion

Hover v. Tenney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Douglas District Court. Eeplevin, brought by Tenney against Hover, to recover a quantity of wheat in the stack, grown upon the north sixty acres of the S.E.-|- of see. 12, tp. 15, range 18, in Douglas county. Trial November 25,1880, and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

The record in this case shows that the trial was had on the 25th day of November, 1880. After the rendition of a verdict by the jury for the plaintiff below and the entry of judgment thereon, the plaintiff in error (defendant below) filed a motion for a new trial, alleging errors occurring during the trial. The record is silent as to the date of the filing of this motion, but it appears that such motion was heard on the 8th day of December, 1880, several days after the verdict and judgment were rendered. As it is not shown by the record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nesbit v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Bartlett v. FeeneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. Lucas v. SturrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Osborne v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Dudley v. BarneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  4. Deford v. OrvisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Burcham v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API