Legal Opinion

In re Wright

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 21, 1899No. 454PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

In this case the county of Worcester sought to prove as a preferred debt against the bankrupts’ estate a claim for money due by the bankrupts as the price of the labor of convicts in the county’s house of correction. The trustee contends: First, that the debt was provable only by the master of the house of correction, being owed to him individually, and not to the county; and, second, that, even if provable by the county, it is not a preferred debt, under the present bankrupt law.

1. Was the debt in question owed to the county of Worcester, and provable by it? Clearly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Rouse, Hazard & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
  2. Bayne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Jones v. Arena Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Ex parte EamesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842
  5. Reed, Bros. & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re BennettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  2. In re JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1907
  3. In re DanielsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1901
  4. Stearns v. FlickDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1900
  5. In re Macon Sash, Door & Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API