Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 12, 1963No. [App. No. 63, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

233 Md. 620 (1963)

195 A.2d 693

FORRESTER

v.

WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[App. No. 63, September Term, 1963.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 12, 1963.

Before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ.

2Per curiam

In his petition for post conviction relief, the applicant contended: (1) the evidence was not sufficient to convict; (2) he was denied due process of law; (3) there was perjured testimony; (4) his statement to the police was involuntary; (5) his arrest was illegal; (6) he was searched without a warrant; and (7) the same counsel should not have been appointed for all…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Sturgis v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API