Legal Opinion
Vigoda v. Rosendahl-Sweeney
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 11, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00182Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 21-cv-00182-STV SUSAN RENEE ZEBELMAN VIGODA, Plaintiff, v. JANET LYNN ROSENDAHL-SWEENEY, THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY REGULATION COUNSEL, KIM IKELER, WILLIAM LUCERO, Defendants. ORDER Entered By Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak This civil action is before the Court on Defendants Kim Ikeler and William Lucero’s Motion to Dismiss [#23], Defendant Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel’s (the “OARC”) Motion to Dismiss [#64], and Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint [#58] (“the Motions”). The parties have consented…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.