Legal Opinion

Hayes ex rel. Hayes v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 29, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

G.S. 1-153 prohibits the allegations of “extraneous, evidential, irrelevant, impertinent, or scandalous matter in a complaint or answer.” Spain v. Brown, 236 N.C. 355, 72 S.E. 2d 918.

In the case at bar the motions to strike were made in apt time, and are therefore made as a matter of right, and are not addressed to the discretion of the court. Baker v. Trailer Co., 242 N.C. 724, 89 S.E. 2d 388; Daniel v. Gardner, 240 N.C. 249, 81 S.E. 2d 660.

“The denial of a motion to strike matter from a pleading under the provisions of G.S. 1-153 is not ground for reversal unless the record affirmatively…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Herndon v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Helms v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Briggs v. DickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API