Legal Opinion
Whitt v. Bennett
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 25, 1992No. 13164PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grady, Judge.
Plaintiffs Coyan D. and Jenetta Whitt appeal from the order of the trial court overruling their motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B).
On February 27, 1986, the Whitts’ vehicle was struck from the rear by a vehicle driven by appellee, Kent S. Bennett. The Whitts retained Attorney William Sams to obtain relief for their injuries and losses.
Attorney Sams filed a complaint, which he voluntarily dismissed on December 5, 1988. He refiled on March 9, 1989. Shortly thereafter, Sams was suspended from the practice of law. See Dayton Bar Assn. v. Sams (1989), 41 Ohio…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Adomeit v. BaltimoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Argo Plastic Products Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McCann v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cerney v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Brunner Firm Co. v. Bussard, 07ap-867 (9-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Gessner v. City of UnionOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- PHH Mtge. Corp. v. NorthrupOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.