Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Brar

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 2005No. G034755PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

I. Background

On July 8, 2003, in the wake of the Trevor Law Group scandal, California’s Attorney General sued attorney Harpreet Brar to make him stop filing similar shakedown lawsuits against small businesses under the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.).

Brar certainly knew of the litigation brought against him by the Attorney General. He demurred to the complaint, the demurrer was overruled, and Brar was given 15 days in which to answer. But instead of answering, Brar filed a motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute.

The motion to strike was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hallett v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Electronic Funds Solutions v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Matera v. McLeodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Conservatorship of Baylacq CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Richardson v. Bank of New York Mellon CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Wong v. Mah CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API