State v. Kraus

— Martin Arthur Kraus appeals from a judgment and sentence entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted robbery in the first degree and robbery in the first degree.

He raises three issues: (1) whether he was denied a fair trial because of a remark of a State's witness that he possessed a "parolee photograph" of Kraus; (2) whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that one of the essential elements of the crime of robbery is the "specific intent to deprive or defraud;" and (3) whether the pretrial identification was so impermissibly suggestive and conducive to…