Burger v. Rice
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Assumpsit by Burger against Rice. The declaration alleges that the defendant had ¿¡greed, in consideration, &c., to give to the plaintiff the keeping of one-half of the paupers of Floyd county, at a certain price; that the plaintiff had been ready and willing to keep them, &c. There is, also, a count for the boarding of paupers, &c.
Pleas, the general issue, and accord and satisfaction. Replication to the second plea, no accord, &c. Issues of fact, and a jury trial. Verdict and judgment for the defendant.
On the trial, William Thomas testified that, about the 1st of May, 1847, the day on which…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Sloan v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Lynch v. RosenthalIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Washington Glass Co. v. MosbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Bancroft v. ScribnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
- Hilton v. CrookerNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.