Legal Opinion

Matco Tools Corporation v. Urquhart

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 22, 2020No. 5:19-cv-01009Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION, ) CASE NO. 5:19-CV-1009 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) JUDGE SARA LIOI ) vs. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER CARY G. URQUHART, ) ) ) DEFENDANT. ) Before the Court is the motion of plaintiff Matco Tools Corporation (“Matco”) for summary judgment (Doc. No. 37 [“MSJ”]). Defendant Cary G. Urquhart (“Urquhart”) did not file an opposition to the motion, and the date for filing such a response has passed. For the reasons discussed herein, Matco’s unopposed motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Matco…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hensley Manufacturing, Inc. v. Propride, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network, L.L.C. v. Tenke Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  5. U.S. Structures, Incorporated, a Foreign Corporation v. J.P. Structures, Incorporated, a Michigan Corporation, and Joseph J. PilatCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API