Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1973No. 46586, 46587PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

These appeals arise out of convictions for possession of a narcotic drug, to wit: marihuana, and for possession of a dangerous drug, to wit: methamphetamine. The cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial without objection, and the appellant was convicted following his pleas of not guilty and- his punishment set at confinement for two (2) years in each case. The trial was a joint trial with the co-defendant, Jimmy Dean Warren.

Appellant’s first ground of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to show that the appellant was in possession of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Haynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Culmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Adair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Ochoa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Carvajal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Hazel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Rhyne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Cole v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API