Legal Opinion

Oberman v. United States Fire Insurance Co. of New York

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1924No. 16016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

February 11, 1922, the department store which had been conducted by appellees for several months in the city of Danville was destroyed by fire. Appellees claimed their total loss was about $50,000. They carried insurance amounting to $38,000, which was distributed among nine companies. Shortly after the fire an adjuster, acting for all the insurance companies, made an investigation, and after examining the books of appellees and what remained of the merchandise fixed the total damages to the stock caused by the fire at $35,000. He 'prepared proofs of loss on this basis and submitted them to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bond v. National Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Illinois Mutual Fire Insurance v. ArchdeaconIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Norwaysz v. Thuringia InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Wilms v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Union Surety & Guaranty Co. v. TenneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Oberman v. Camden Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Dan Hayes Boiler & Repair Co. v. Illinois Masonic Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Feigenbaum v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  5. Rodewald v. Randolph Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API