Legal Opinion

Karr v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1927No. 7133. [fn*]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The parties will be designated appellant and appellees. Appellant sued ap-pellees to recover a broker’s commission, alleging that he had listed with him certain real estate at a net price to the owner of $20 -per acre; that Hubert Shores assisted him in the matter; that they interested appellees in the purchase of the land, advising them that the price was $20 per acre net to the owner, and that their agent’s commission would have to be paid in addition thereto; that after being so advised appellees sought and accepted their services, and through their efforts a written contract was entered…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Taylor v. DeseveTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Fordtran v. StowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Huffhines v. BourlandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stevens v. KarrTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Northside Lumber & Bldg. Co. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. McNeil v. McLainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Jones v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API