Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Tykol

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 19, 2024No. 6:21-cv-01715Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION OFELIA HERNANDEZ SANTIAGO, Case No. 6:21-cv-01715-MK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION vs. CITY OF EUGENE, SAMUEL TYKOL, and JOHN DOES 1-3, Defendants. _________________________________________ KASUBHAI, United States Magistrate Judge: On November 29, 2021, Plaintiff Ofelia Hernandez Santiago (“Plaintiff”) filed this § 1983 action as a personal representative of the Estate of Eliborio Rodrigues Jr. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Officer Samuel Tykol violated Mr. Rodrigues’s Fourth Amendment rights. Pl.’s Compl. ¶¶ 41–66,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API