Legal Opinion

Toll v. Toll

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1994No. Nos. WD 47759, WD 47760, WD 48506 and WD 48507PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Alfred Toll appeals from an order of protection granted to his wife, Lupe Toll, section 455.010, et seq., RSMo Supp.1992, and from an order of protection granted to his daughter and two step-daughters, section 455.500, et seq., RSMo Supp.1992.

During the pendency of this appeal, the protection orders expired and were no longer in effect when the case was submitted. The case is therefore moot. See K.E.B. et al. v. H.G.B., 782 S.W.2d 85, 86 (Mo.App.1989).

We in our discretion decide moot appeals “where an issue of public importance prom*291ises to recur, yet will evade decision, unless the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grogan v. HaysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In the Interest of K.E.B. v. H.G.B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.L.R.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. McGrath v. McGrathMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Pope v. HowardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Glenn v. MoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API