Legal Opinion
N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Luckel, King & Cake Soap Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon
Decided February 21, 1901No. 2,426PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
On an appeal taken from the decree of this court (88 Fed. 694) to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Ninth circuit it was found that the complainant in this cause was entitled to an injunction against the defendant’s use of the trademark name, "Gold Drop,” upon the ground that it infringed the trademark name of the complainant, “Gold Dust,” — a name under which the complainant had manufactured and sold packages of a certain soap since the year 1887. The cause being remanded to this court, the question is now presented whether, upon such injunction, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Low v. FelsUnited States Circuit Court · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scotton v. WrightCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
- Worcester Brewing Corp. v. Rueter & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1907
- U-Drive-It Co. v. Wright & TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Artiste Permanent Wave Co. v. HulsmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- McMahon v. Harms, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942