Legal Opinion
Patricia Kennedy & Co. v. Zam-Cul Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 23, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-12772-ZPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Introduction
In its complaint, the plaintiff Patricia Kennedy & Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Kennedy & Co.”) alleged that the defendants Zam-Cul Enterprises, Inc. and Ambulance Systems of America, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “ASA”) had infringed its rights under the federal copyright law and, further, had en gaged in unfair or deceptive practices in violation of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A. During a three-day trial in early May of this year, the copyright claim was tried to a jury while the Chapter 93A claim…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William R. Gooley v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Computer Associates International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Altai, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tingley Systems, Inc. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Rubin v. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Henry v. National Geographic SocietyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Skinder-Strauss Associates v. Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Titan Sports, Inc. v. Turner Broadcasting Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.