Legal Opinion
Southern Pride, Inc. v. Turbo Tek Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided November 18, 1987No. Civ. A. No. C-87-260-GPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GORDON, Senior District Judge:
Defendant Turbo Tek Enterprises (“Turbo Tek”) moves to dismiss plaintiff Southern Pride’s trademark infringement and unfair trade action for insufficient service of process and improper venue. The court denies defendant’s motion.
FACTS
Southern Pride is a North Carolina corporation having its principal place of business in Burlington, North Carolina. Southern Pride manufactures and sells car wash chemicals and equipment under the “Turbo Wash” trademark. Turbo Tek is a California corporation having its principal place of business in Los Angeles,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- M. Thora Worrell v. B.F. Goodrich CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Tools USA & Equipment Co. v. Champ Frame Straightening Equipment, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
- DaShiell v. Ohio Citizens Bank (In Re DaShiell)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991