Legal Opinion

Chase v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 21, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPLEY, Justice.

On appeal. An appeal was taken by the appellant from the findings of a single Justice. The findings are to be tested by the “Clearly Erroneous” Rule. Rule 52 M.R.C.P.; Harriman v. Spaulding, 156 Me. 440, 165 A.2d 47.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of murder at the November Term, 1952 of the Superior Court, within and for the County of Androscoggin, State of Maine. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. Previous to the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus brought under provisions of 14 M.R.S.A., Secs. 5502-5508 the appellant commenced and prosecuted four other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. LaRue v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Wilson v. BanmillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Harriman v. SpauldingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fortune v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. Cunningham v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Daniel L. Fortune v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API