Legal Opinion

Vredenburgh v. Bachman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1926No. 4686PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by plaintiffs in error (herein called plaintiffs), to recover damages because of alleged false representations made by defendants in error (herein called defendants) as to the value, location, condition, and productiveness of a described tract of land in California, which, pursuant to a trade made at Austin, Texas, in May, 1921, for the exchange of lands, was conveyed to plaintiffs by defendants. There was evidence tending to prove the material allegations of the petition. The court instructed the jury to the effect that the plaintiffs were not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peck v. AshurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Carver v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Donati v. Cleveland Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
  4. Covington Cotton Oil Co. v. Bickmore Nitrating Cotton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meacham v. HalleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  2. Campbell v. McCownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Duncan v. Van-Tex Royalty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Meacham v. HalleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API