Legal Opinion

Pepper v. Telegraph Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1889PublishedCited by 31 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. B. M. Estes, Cli.

1Opinion of the CourtFolkes, J.

This is a suit by complainants c+O recover damages for a breach of a contract cr O *556deliver correctly a certain telegram entrusted to defendant as the owner and operator of a telegraph line.

The- facts necessary to a correct understanding of the case are as follows:

On October 5, 1886, R. IT. Bugg & Oo., produce brokers at Birmingham, Ala., sent by defendant company to complainants, who were produce dealers at Memphis, this telegi’am: “ Quote cribs loose, and strips packed.” Thereupon complainant wrote out upon the usual printed blanks of the defendant company, and delivered to the proper agent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago & Iowa Railroad v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Saveland v. GreenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ShotterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Cairo & St. Louis Railroad v. MahoneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Smith v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Smith v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
  3. J. A. Shingleur & Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Bierhaus v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1893

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API