Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. Teevens

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1993No. Civ. 910149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

This is a disciplinary proceeding against William P. Teevens, Jr., a disbarred attorney, for conduct occurring prior to his disbarment. We extend the period within which Teevens shall remain ineligible to apply for reinstatement.

Teevens was disbarred on February 10, 1988, for misappropriation of client funds. See In re Teevens, 418 N.W.2d 789 (N.D.1988). After his disbarment, numerous additional instances of conversion of client funds were discovered. Disciplinary counsel filed a petition for additional discipline, alleging that Teevens had converted funds from four additional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of KraemerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re TeevensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Montgomery v. Disciplinary BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Matter of MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Stephen J. Baird, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0398840. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  5. Mississippi Bar v. KeithMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API