Legal Opinion

State v. Flowers

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 26, 2004No. AC 23480PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The defendant, Cornelius Flowers, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a juiy trial, of burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (2).1 On appeal, the defendant raises the following claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence to convict him of burglary; (2) his burglary conviction is inconsistent with the jury’s inability to reach a verdict on two charges of attempt to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a-59 (a) (1) and (4); (3) it was improper for the trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. State v. LittleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. FlowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. State v. LeggettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. State v. MourningConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API