State v. Flowers
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Cornelius Flowers, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a juiy trial, of burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (2).1 On appeal, the defendant raises the following claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence to convict him of burglary; (2) his burglary conviction is inconsistent with the jury’s inability to reach a verdict on two charges of attempt to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a-59 (a) (1) and (4); (3) it was improper for the trial court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. LittleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FlowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. LeggettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. MourningConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.