Legal Opinion

Wolf v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 28, 1923No. 285PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was tried and convicted under an indictment which charged that he unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly had in his possession, with intent to convert to his own use, 150 bolts of woolens, which were stolen while moving in interstate commerce, the goods being taken from a freight house of the New York Central Railroad in New York, knowing the same to have been stolen. The indictment was under the Act of February 13, 1913 (37 Stat. 67Ó [Comp. St. §§ 8603, 8604]). The part of the statute applicable to the case is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. United States v. CoolidgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1815
  5. Coleman v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pedro Amado Torres v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. United States v. Robert E. Burns and Margaret Ann GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Herbert Ray JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. Tingley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  5. United States v. Joseph L. GalloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API