Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kelly v. Peeples

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 23, 1987No. 22804Published

1DissentHarwell, Justice

I respectfully dissent and would affirm the Order of the Circuit Court with one modification and remand.

Appellant brought this action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, S. C. Code Ann. § 15-53-30 (1976), asking the court to determine the validity of a 1972 written agreement entered into by appellant, his stepfather, and his stepfather’s wife. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that the agreement was valid and held that the appellant was indebted to his stepfather’s estate and to his stepfather’s wife. I would affirm as modified and remand.

The factual situation giving rise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Davie v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API