Legal Opinion

Davie v. Atkinson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 12, 1987No. 0861PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This action was commenced by the Davie heirs to impress a constructive trust upon certain real property owned by the Atkinson heirs. The parties had agreed at a pre-trial conference that certain testimony of Hider Davie, one of the plaintiffs to the action, was essential to establishing the trust relationship with the Atkinson heirs’ deceased ancestor. At trial, the judge ruled that this testimony was barred by the Dead Man’s Statute, and granted a Motion for Involuntary Nonsuit. The Davie heirs appeal. We affirm.

The parties to this action have a common ancestor, Thomas Wells,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norris v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  2. Long v. ConroySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  3. Davie v. Atkinson Ex Rel. Estate of AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Austin Ex Rel. Estate of Austin v. Conway Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Kelly v. PeeplesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Kelly v. PeeplesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API