Legal Opinion

Tomaszewski v. Giera

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 4, 2003No. 02-2409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANE, C.J.

¶ 1. David Giera appeals a judgment ordering him to pay Robert Tomaszewski $1,998 for his share of a fence Tomaszewski built on the border of their adjacent lands pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 90.10. Tomaszewski sued Giera to recover his cost of building Giera's portion of the fence after the town fence viewers determined Giera owed significantly less than what Tomaszewski actually paid to build the fence. Giera moved for summary judgment arguing the remedy provided in the fence viewing statute, Wis. Stat. § 90.11, was the only remedy available to Tomaszewski and that the fence viewers'…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. John Mohr & Sons, Inc. v. JahnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Kaczkowski v. Fire & Police CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. WaalenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Klinger v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Ruthenberg v. Annuity & Pension Board of City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gentilli v. Board of the Police & Fire CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Town of Merrimac v. Village of MerrimacCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  3. Gentilli v. BOARD OF POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSIONERSWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. White v. City of WatertownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API