Legal Opinion

Geenty v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 25, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company issued to Jay F. Carlisle two policies of insurance upon his life, naming as beneficiary his wife if she should be living at his death, otherwise his executor, administrator or assigns. There was no reservation to the insured of a right to change the beneficiary named in the policies. Subsequently, upon the request of Mr. Carlisle and his wife, the policies were altered so as to be payable to her or her executors, administrators or assigns. She died, leaving a large estate and a will in which she gave to each of the sons the sum of $25,000 and gave…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Reilly v. Antonio Pepe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Iowa v. SlimmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rousseau v. United States Trust Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  2. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. Danbury National Bank v. MillardConnecticut Superior Court · 1946
  4. Finch v. ReeseConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
  5. Orloff v. HayesConnecticut Superior Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API