Legal Opinion

Conrath v. Houchin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is an action on a promissory note, with an agreement as to deposit of collateral attached.

The petition is in two counts, the first of which asks reformation of the instrument sued on so as to conform to the true intent of the parties; and the second count is a suit on the note proper as reformed. The first count was tried as a suit in equity, on June 30, 1927. After hearing the evidence the court took the case under advisement, and on October 15, 1927, ■ rendered its judgment reforming the note. Defendant James A. Houchin was adjudged to be in default and judgment was rendered against…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Wilhite v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. Blackmer & Post Pipe Co. v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Clancy v. Herman C. G. Luyties Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Emery v. WhitwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strohm v. BodenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Strothcamp v. Sandy Ford Ranch, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Campbell v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Wanstrath v. KappelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Marriage of Katz v. KatzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API