Strothcamp v. Sandy Ford Ranch, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
This is a suit to reform a deed by striking a restrictive clause that plaintiffs contend was fraudulently inserted in the deed by the defendant-grantor. The trial court reformed the deed accordingly, and the defendant appeals. The issue is whether plaintiffs’ evidence established actionable fraud warranting reformation. We find it did and affirm the decree.
The plaintiff-grantees are John A. and Gladys Strothcamp. The defendant-grantor is a closely held corporation owned and managed by Mr. Francis H. Kennedy. The final transaction took place through the agency of the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. TatroMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Bolten v. ColburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Schnuck v. KriegshauserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Emily v. BayneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Moran Bolt & Nut Manufacturing Co. v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lake Wauwanoka, Inc. v. SpainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Kreutz v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Rainey v. FolandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Stein v. Stein Egg & Poultry Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Dewey v. JenkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.