Legal Opinion

Fisher, Exrx. v. Fid. and Cas. Co. of N.Y.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1934No. Appeal, 158PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This suit on an accident insurance policy to recover specific injury indemnity is brought on the theory that the insured’s personal representative may exercise an option that the insured, if he had lived, might have exercised to recover for specific injury instead of under a total disability provision. The appeal is from the judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

The statement of claim sets forth the circumstances in which the policy was issued, “in order that the terms and provisions of said policy may be properly understood and interpreted for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Columbian National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. North American Accident Insurance v. CochranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Miner v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Browne v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Kovacs v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of BostonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API