Legal Opinion

Browne v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1935No. Appeal, 224PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

Plaintiff, the beneficiary in an insurance policy on the life of her husband, James F. Browne, brought this action to recover a balance claimed to be due thereon. The cause was submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts and judgment was entered for the amount claimed by the plaintiff. Two questions of law are raised on the agreed facts, to wit: (1) Was the policy in default by reason of a failure to pay the premium within the time fixed by the contract, and (2) was the beneficiary, after the death of the assured, entitled to elect to take the benefit of that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lantz v. Vermont L. Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Entwistle v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Jeske, Admx. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. McDonald v. Columbian National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Rhodes v. Royal Union Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. New England, C., Insurance Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  2. Wagenhorst v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Kovacs v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of BostonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. Kratzer v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1952
  5. Pergrin v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API