Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1926No. 17186Published

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

The evidence introduced for the plaintiff showed that he had a valid mortgage-note on three mules to secure a debt due him by the mortgagor for supplies; that the defendant, after reading over the mortgage-note one afternoon, caused the mules to be carried away the same night and conveyed into another State; that foreclosure proceedings were *369instituted on the mortgage, and a return of nulla bona was made by the levying officer; that the value of the mules exceeded the amount of the debt; that the mortgagor owned nothing except a little corn, and that the mortgage-note was never paid. Held:

Deci…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DeVaughn v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Harris v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Reid v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Todd v. Hurst Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API