Todd v. Hurst Supply Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of LaG-range — Judge Harwell. March 13, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. A mortgage purporting to have been signed on the ......day of ....... 1912,, and which appears to have been properly witnessed, and which was duly recorded on August 7, 1912, covering described crops, “all planted and growing” on certain lands, was not so defective as to date as to be too indefinite to constitute a lien on the property as to third persons. The mortgage was at least good from the time of its record.
2. Where the entry of the levy of a mortgage fi. fa. on certain property described therein was immediately followed by the written statement that “upon motion of plaintiff in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. McKaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- DeVaughn v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Harris v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Derrick v. SamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Benton v. McCordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cheek v. J. Allen Couch & Son Funeral HomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Mills Lumber Co. v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Jones & Damren Auto Co. v. LottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Franklin v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- McDuffie Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923