Legal Opinion

Ollestead v. Native Village of Tyonek

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1977No. 2503PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

This appeal concerns the jurisdiction of the courts of Alaska to decide whether appellants are members of the Native Village of Tyonek (the Village) which was organized pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 984). 1

The superior court dismissed the action relying on Fondahn v. Native Village of Tyonek, 450 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1971), and Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe, 249 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1957), which denied federal court jurisdiction of membership disputes. It concluded that authority to decide , such disputes lies solely with the tribe itself.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Morgan v. Colorado River Indian TribeArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Patterson v. Council of the Seneca NationNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. HaldaneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. John v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sheppard v. SheppardIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ahboah v. Housing Authority of the Kiowa Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Calista Corp. v. MannAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API