Legal Opinion

State v. Rawlings

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 14, 1911PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Special Judge. (1) The information is fatally defective in failing to allege that the defendant was engaged in running an “order house” or was acting as an agent for such house or in that capacity. State v. Price, 229 Mo. 670. (2) The information is fatally defective in failing to allege that the person for whom defendant delivered the liquor was not authorized by law to deal in intoxicating liquors.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Special Judge. (1) The information is fatally defective in failing to allege that the defendant was engaged in running an “order house” or was acting as an agent for such house or in that capacity. State v. Price, 229 Mo. 670. (2) The information is fatally defective in failing to allege that the person for whom defendant delivered the liquor was not authorized by law to deal in intoxicating liquors. State v. Price, 229 Mo. 670; Laws 1907, pp. 231-232. (2) The court erred in overruling defendant’s motion to quash the information in this…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The defendant prosecutes this appeal from a judgment imposing upon him a fine of $300, for violating Laws of 1907, page 232 (now sections 7226 to 7229, R. S. 1909), regulating the keeping, *554storing and delivery of intoxicating liquors in counties having adopted the Local Option Law.

The evidence shows that the defendant was running a tailor shop in the city of Mt. Vernon, in Lawrence county, on the first day of December, 1909', and desiring some intoxicating liquor, went to a butcher shop where one Will Williams was employed and asked Williams for the address of certain persons in Springfield,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MeyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Kansas City v. StegmillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. State v. Great Western Coffee & Tea Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. State v. FulksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. City of St. Louis v. WortmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wells v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Boykin v. Ball Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Ploch v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  5. Vice v. City of KirksvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API