Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Jackson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1983No. 46382PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Respondent husband separately appeals from the trial court’s order granting petitioner wife $2,500 for attorney fees and costs on appeal. He contends this is excessive in view of his present monthly $900 earnings.

Husband raised the same argument in his appeal from allowances granted wife by the original decree. We affirmed. See the case of Katherine L. Jackson v. O. Lester Jackson, 655 S.W.2d 786 (Mo.App.1983) recently handed down.

There as here husband based his argument on inadequate monthly earnings. Present earnings are but one factor in determining ability to pay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foster v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Jackson v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Morovitz v. MorovitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marriage of Calicott v. CalicottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Barac v. BaracMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Hoke v. HokeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API