Legal Opinion

Marriage of Calicott v. Calicott

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1984No. 13540PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

Upon his Motion to Modify, the trial court reduced the respondent-husband’s payment of maintenance from $1,450 to $850 per month. The basic contention of appellant-wife is that under the applicable law, the evidence does not support that modification. The pertinent evidence will be only briefly summarized.

The parties’ marriage of 28 years duration was dissolved in a contested proceeding on March 24, 1981. See Calicott v. Calicott, 634 S.W.2d 570 (Mo.App.1982). Two of their three children had reached majority. The custody of a 19-year-old son was declared to be in the wife. She was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seelig v. SeeligMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Foster v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Weiss v. WeissMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. In Re the Marriage of PitluckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Early v. EarlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mendelsohn v. MendelsohnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re the Marriage of BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Vance v. VanceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. McKinney v. McKinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Light v. LightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API