Legal Opinion

Crooks v. Inland 465 Limited Partnership

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1996No. 22155Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This is an appeal involving eligibility for unemployment benefits pursuant to section 72 — 1366(f) and (g) of the Idaho Code. The State of Idaho Industrial Commission held that the claimant, Dan Crooks, did not refuse an offer of available suitable employment. The employer, Inland 465, appeals from the decision of the Industrial Commission.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Daniel R. Crooks (Crooks) was employed by Inland 465 (Inland) as general manager from January 12, 1993, to July 15, 1994. At the time of his separation from Inland, Crooks was paid $6,250.93 per month.

Inlan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dewey v. MerrillIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Burnside v. Gate City Steel Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wulff v. Sun Valley Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Laundry v. Franciscan Health Care CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API