In re M. Z.
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Minna R. Buck, J.
On motion of respondents, a pretrial hearing was held concerning the admissibility in a fact-finding proceeding under *565article 10 of the Family Court Act of certain evidence obtained through a technique known as "facilitated communication”. (See below.) At the conclusion of petitioner’s proof, respondents moved to preclude such testimony on the grounds that petitioner had failed to present a prima facie case as to its admissibility.
NATURE OF THE EVIDENCE
As described to the court, "facilitated communication” is a technique whereby the "speaker’s” hand,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. AllweissNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WardenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- People v. BohrerPenfield Justice Court · 2012