Legal Opinion

Rothman v. Dolin

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1993No. B068584PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment on a petition for court supervision of the winding up of a dissolved law corporation, the two shareholders of which were appellant Norman M. Dolin and respondent Daniel L. Rothman.

In early 1982, appellant and respondent were each 50 percent shareholders of Dolin & Rothman, a professional corporation (the Firm). By mutual agreement, the Firm was dissolved on May 31, 1982. At the time of the dissolution, the parties agreed on the division of the Firm’s cases. However, they did not agree upon the allocation of fees to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jewel v. BoxerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Fox v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Lyon v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Freese v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greenspan v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (In Re Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2009
  2. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Ashdale (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Robinson v. NussbaumDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  4. Geron ex rel. Thelen LLP v. Robinson & Cole LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Development Specialists, Inc. ex rel. Coudert Brothers LLP v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API