Halabu v. Behnke
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentSmolenski, J.
I respectfully dissent. I construe the phrase "within the period herein specified” in the second sentence of the second paragraph of § 73a of the General Property Tax Act, MCL 211.73a; MSA 7.119, as providing for a five-year period. I disagree with the majority that such a construction renders this phrase surplusage or nugatory when read in conjunction with the second sentence of the first paragraph of § 73a.
The language of the first paragraph’s second sentence provides that a tax title purchaser is barred from asserting title if the purchaser fails to give the required notice within five…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Helen Resort Ass'n v. HannanMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Andre v. FinkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Adair v. BonninghausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Brousseau v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Closser v. AbrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.