Baird v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BBOOKS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
Appellant's first complaint in motion for a new trial is to the overruling of the application for continuance. The application does not show any merit. The substance of same was contravened if not entirely controverted by testimony of appellant upon the trial of this ease, and it is rendered entirely improbable by the testimony in the trial of this case. It follows^ therefore, the court did°not err in overruling same.
• Bill of exceptions No. 2 complains that the court…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Wisdom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Criner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Horace Kitchens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.