Legal Opinion
Autotel v. Nevada Bell Telephone Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 4, 2012No. 10-15663PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
This case arises out of a dispute between two telecommunications carriers. Plaintiff-Appellant Autotel is a Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) provider wishing to provide wireless service in and around Pahrump, Nevada. It seeks digital interconnection with the facilities and equipment of Defendant-Appellee Nevada Bell Telephone Co. (AT & T Nevada), the incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC) in the area. After the parties’ efforts to negotiate an interconnection agreement failed, Autotel brought suit in federal court, alleging that AT & T Nevada violated the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Susan Cripps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Maldonado v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Turtle Island Restoration Network v. United States Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Western Radio Services Co. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Schlegel Ex Rel. Schlegel v. Wells Fargo Bank, NACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Ismail v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- United States v. Christopher OsingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United Steel Workers Local 12-369 v. United Steel Workers InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Ahmed AlahmedalabdaloklahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.