Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Weikal

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1906No. 14,493PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Kingman district court; Preston B. Gillett, judge.

1Per curiam

While H. C. Weikal was helping Walter Moyer, a machinist, to furrow out a key-seat in a steel shaft of hoisting machinery át a coal-chute he was struck in the eye by a chip which flew from the chisel, and which destroyed the sight of the eye. It occurred in the night-time, while Weikal was holding a torch for the machinist. He charged that suitable light was not furnished; that the tools used were defective; that the machinist was negligent in the use of the tools; that the place was not a suitable one in which to work; and that he was not warned of the danger to which he was exposed.

The…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. QuinlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Parker v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Ohio Valley Railway Co. v. CopleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Steele v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API