Ratkovic v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
Mary Ratkovic brought this action in assumpsit against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to recover as beneficiary the face of a policy in that company on the life of her husband, Daniel Ratkovic. The defense was that the insured in his written application for the insurance knowingly made false and fraudulent answers to questions which were essentially material to the risk and that by reason thereof the policy was void. The issue was submitted to a jury which found for the plaintiff. The defendant, the appellant, complains of the refusal of its motions for binding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Suravitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Livingood v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crawford v. Manhattan L. Ins. Co. of NYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Franklin Life Insurance Company v. Mary E. Bieniek and Sewickley Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Baldwin v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- The First Pennsylvania Banking And Trust Company v. The United States Life Insurance Company In The City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Garland v. CravenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.