Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Larsen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 24, 2017No. Supreme Court Case 16SC68Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Hood

¶18 As I explained in my dissent in People v. Jacobson, 2017 CO 28, 393 P.3d 548, I disagree with the majority’s decision to depart from Harper v. People, 817 P.2d 77 (Colo. 1991), Thus, to the extent the majority concludes the trial court did not err, by relying on Jacobson’s new rule that a court need not poll jurors about prejudicial midtrial media so long as it has adequately admonished the jury to avoid media, I dissent.2 I would apply Harper as it was written and conclude that the trial court here erred by refusing to poll the jury about the prejudicial newspaper article. However,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hagos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  2. Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  3. Harper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API