Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Putnam

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1881PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

Defendant in error recovered a judgment against the city for injuries sustained by reason of a defective sidewalk. It is not claimed that the action would lie in tin's State in the absence of a statute creating the liability. The plaintiff below relied upon act No. 244 of the Laws of 1879, p. 223, which is entitled “An act for the collection of damages sustained by reason of defective public highways, streets, bridges, crosswalks and culverts.” The first section of the act creates a liability in favor of persons “ sustaining ■bodily injury upon any of the public highways or streets in *264this…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. O'Leary v. Board of Fire & Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Stremler v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. City of Detroit v. ChaffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Miller v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API